
Case studies
How Xerox Improved Global Data Integrity in Salesforce
Xerox's global CRM team cleaned up cross-team duplicate records in Salesforce, then added prevention so marketing targeting and client reporting stay accurate as the company scales.
![]()
The system is only as good as the data that is in our system.

Robin Hood Foundation distributes $150-170 million in grants a year to fight poverty in New York City. Every contact record in its Salesforce org represents a real person: a donor funding affordable housing, a grantee running a job-training program, a program officer coordinating time-sensitive outreach to families in need.
After more than 10 years in Salesforce and 220,000+ contact and account records, the foundation had a problem manual processes couldn't fix: duplicates everywhere. Staff had created thousands of duplicate contacts over the years, donor data was scattered across records, and there was no reliable way to check whether an email address would actually deliver. Salesforce's native tools, including the enhanced duplicate management package, couldn't scale to the size of the problem.
Robin Hood brought in Plauti, running natively inside Salesforce with no separate app to log into and no external connection to maintain. In two weeks, the team cleaned up a decade of duplicate records, built duplicate prevention into every point where a contact gets created, and put itself in a position to trust its data for AI-powered donor intelligence.
Here's how they did it.
Hao Lyu leads the Business Intelligence team at Robin Hood Foundation and manages its entire Salesforce instance. He builds the automations, designs the flows, and makes sure every process, from donor management to grant tracking, runs on data his team can trust.
His philosophy is direct: "The system is only as good as the data that is in our system. No matter how advanced or how automated you design your system, if the data is not good, it's meaningless."
For Hao, data quality isn't a one-time cleanup project. It's an ongoing system.
Over 10+ years, Robin Hood's Salesforce database grew to more than 220,000 records. That growth reflected the foundation's impact, but it also created problems that manual processes couldn't solve.
Manual contact creation was the cause. Staff across development, program teams, and operations created new contacts as part of their daily work. Sometimes they didn't realize a contact already existed. Sometimes a search didn't surface the right match. Sometimes it was just faster to create a new record than dig through old ones.
The results:
Robin Hood works with high-profile donors and time-sensitive grantee outreach, so the team couldn't auto-merge everything blindly. Every merge decision mattered.
Robin Hood's development team and program officers depend on accurate email and phone data for mission-critical outreach:
But there was no built-in way to check whether an email address was deliverable or a phone number was correct. Staff sent test emails and waited for bounces, verified contact info with outside tools, and cross-checked records before every major outreach campaign. It was slow, repetitive, and added risk to communications that couldn't afford to fail.

Hao and the Robin Hood team compared three options:
Plauti won, for three reasons.
Robin Hood needed a tool that lived inside Salesforce: no separate login, no external desktop app to install, no fragile API connection that could break.
"We've been looking for a solution that's native in Salesforce. We don't want a separate application. Something that's native on the platform allows us to configure directly within our environment and tie it to other processes and automations, without having to log into another application." — Hao Lyu, Director of Business Intelligence, Robin Hood Foundation
That mattered because it meant:
The team needed automated merging for obvious duplicates, but manual review for sensitive, high-profile donor records. Plauti gave them both: auto-merge rules for high-confidence matches, and a manual merge screen for the judgment calls.
"Manually merging using Plauti is just way easier, because you can open up more than three records at the same time, and you get to pick whichever, and then you can even override the information on the very left-hand side. It's a more direct way of merging records." — Hao Lyu, Director of Business Intelligence, Robin Hood Foundation
Salesforce's native merge tool caps out at three records. Plauti let the team open multiple duplicate records at once, compare them side by side, and choose exactly which fields to keep, overriding the default selection where needed.
For a nonprofit, every dollar spent on tools is a dollar not spent on the mission. Robin Hood chose Plauti because it delivered the best price-to-capability ratio of the three options it evaluated.
Robin Hood had just finished a contact management overhaul that reduced its record types and streamlined its contact structure. With that in place, the team ran a Plauti dedupe job against the full database.
The results after two weeks:
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Duplicate pairs identified | ~2,600 pairs |
| Match confidence | 95%+ match score on nearly all pairs |
| Merged in 2 weeks | 54.9% (~1,427 contacts) |
| Manual review | High-profile donor records review individually |
Robin Hood didn't stop at cleanup. The bigger change was catching duplicates before they happened, by embedding Plauti directly into the custom contact-creation Flow.
Here's how it works:
"A lot of the dupes were actually introduced during the manual creation process. We've embedded Plauti into the flow so that before folks save a record, it checks whether there are potential dupes. Instead of creating a new one, they can just be directed to the actual record." — Hao Lyu, Director of Business Intelligence, Robin Hood Foundation
Robin Hood built a custom Flow because its contact and account objects carry so many fields that the standard Salesforce form is overwhelming. The custom Flow asks for only the essential information and runs the duplicate check before the save, so duplicates are caught before they reach the database. Contact creation is faster, and staff no longer create records that just get merged away later.
Robin Hood added validation indicators directly to its contact page layouts, so staff see data quality at a glance: a green checkmark for a valid email, a red warning for one that's invalid or risky, a phone validation status, and a warning if a potential duplicate exists. That removed the need for manual verification, test emails, and follow-up work, which mattered most for time-sensitive donor solicitations and grantee outreach.
| Before Plauti | After Plauti (2 weeks) |
|---|---|
| ~2,600 duplicate contact pairs | 54.9% merged (~1,427 contacts) |
| Staff confusion: "Which is the right record" | Once source of truth per contact |
| Manual merge: slow, painful, unsustainable | Intuitive UI + auto-merge rules |
The cleanup addressed the backlog. These guardrails address what comes next:
When staff trust the data they work with, they take ownership of it. Before Plauti, users were frustrated and second-guessing what they saw. Now they have a clearer picture: duplicate warnings point them to the right record, validation marks confirm the email is accurate, and they know they're looking at one source of truth.
"There's less confusion around looking at the records. It provides more clarity to our staff, knowing that they're absolutely looking at the right record." — Hao Lyu, Director of Business Intelligence, Robin Hood Foundation
Trust changed behavior. When users trust the data, they take ownership of its quality instead of leaving it to the admin team.
For Hao, data quality isn't the end goal. It's the foundation for everything else Robin Hood wants to build:
"Data is the foundation for the success of deploying AI. Clean data as a prerequisite for AI deployment is a critical thing." — Hao Lyu, Director of Business Intelligence, Robin Hood Foundation
Robin Hood is using that clean, trusted data as the foundation for its next decade of work.

For Robin Hood, data quality isn't a one-time project. It's a cadence and a culture.
"We do a summer cleanup every year. We have a cadence in terms of running the jobs, making sure that we merge the contacts manually or intelligently with the auto-merge. Ultimately, we want to be able to capture potential dupes in every entry point of contact being created." — Hao Lyu, Director of Business Intelligence, Robin Hood Foundation
That annual rhythm, plus prevention that runs every day, is how Robin Hood keeps a quarter-million records trustworthy as its database keeps growing.

Case studies
Xerox's global CRM team cleaned up cross-team duplicate records in Salesforce, then added prevention so marketing targeting and client reporting stay accurate as the company scales.

Case studies
Wedgewood Weddings cut duplicate-lead merges from five minutes to 20 seconds and raised contact center capacity 25%, using Salesforce-native tools to get its data ready for AI.
Robin Hood Foundation's Salesforce database held more than 220,000 contact and account records after over a decade on the platform. A cleanup project identified about 2,600 duplicate pairs, with match confidence above 95% on nearly all of them, and the team merged 54.9% of those pairs, about 1,427 contacts, within two weeks.
Robin Hood built its own contact-creation Flow instead of using Salesforce's standard New button. Before a record saves, Plauti checks for potential duplicates and, if it finds a match, shows the user a real-time warning that directs them to the existing record instead of creating a new one.
Robin Hood needed a tool that ran natively inside Salesforce with no separate login or external connection to maintain. Plauti also let staff open more than the three records Salesforce's native merge tool allows, compare them side by side, and override field selections during a merge, at what the team judged to be the best price-to-capability ratio of the three options it evaluated.
With a product tour you can walk through the product yourself without installing anything, or book a demo for a guided look.